Stover v. State

365 So. 2d 176, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17101
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 1978
DocketNos. 78-551 through 78-555 and 78-564
StatusPublished

This text of 365 So. 2d 176 (Stover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stover v. State, 365 So. 2d 176, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments and sentences of the trial court, but we agree with appellant that the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence imposed for grand larceny is improper. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court for removal of the hard labor provision. Appellant need not be present for this correction.

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight v. State
349 So. 2d 232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 So. 2d 176, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stover-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.