Stover v. Cogswell

57 Barb. 448, 1870 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 65
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 57 Barb. 448 (Stover v. Cogswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stover v. Cogswell, 57 Barb. 448, 1870 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 65 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1870).

Opinion

By the Qourt, Oardozo, J.

The plaintiff' here nad an opportunity to interpose the defense of fraud and corruption which he charges on the arbitrator, in the action brought against him upon the award; and when that is so an injunction should not issue to restrain the proceedings in that suit, either before or after judgment. (Snediker v. Pearson, 2 Barb. Ch. 107.) He is not remediless. He can yet move in that action for such relief as the facts [449]*449may show he ought to have against the judgment which has passed against him. If he could not, perhaps another question might be presented which it is not necessary now to consider.

[First Department, General Term, September 5, 1870.

The order should be reversed.

Ingraham, 1.1., and Cardoza, Justice.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snediker v. Pearson
2 Barb. Ch. 107 (New York Court of Chancery, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Barb. 448, 1870 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stover-v-cogswell-nysupct-1870.