Stovall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stovall v. State

197 So. 3d 637, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12355, 2016 WL 4362386

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2016·No. No. 1D16-1654·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing the appellant’s rule 3.801 motion seeking jail credit for the time period he was held in the county jail after he was mistakenly released from the Department of Corrections, then rearrested and held in the county jail pending his return to Department custody. However, we do so without prejudice to the appellant seeking credit for this time period with the Department. Williams v. State, 673 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing the appellant’s rule 3.801 motion seeking jail credit for the time period he was held in the county jail after he was mistakenly released from the Department of Corrections, then rearrested and held in the county jail pending his return to Department custody. However, we do so without prejudice to the appellant seeking credit for this time period with the Department. Williams v. State, 673 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ, concur.

Stovall v. State, 197 So. 3d 637, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12355, 2016 WL 4362386 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

197 So. 3d 637 (Stovall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related