Stovall v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Stovall v. State

768 So. 2d 444, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 652, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1749, 2000 WL 1227759

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 31, 2000·No. No. SC95059·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Stovall v. State, 727 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its decision in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the district court’s decision in this case and remand for consideration in light of our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Stovall v. State, 727 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its decision in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the district court’s decision in this case and remand for consideration in light of our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Stovall v. State, 768 So. 2d 444, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 652, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1749, 2000 WL 1227759 (Fla. 2000).

Pincite

768 So. 2d 444 (Stovall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related