Stovall v. Coker

88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 126, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 161
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 19, 1916
Docket6770
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 907 (Stovall v. Coker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stovall v. Coker, 88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 126, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, J.

This case is controlled by the ruling of this court in Glasco v. Cooper, 17 Ga. App. 690 (87 S. E. 1095), in which it was held: “Even though the defendant collected his wages after he had assigned them, and conceding that the assignment was valid, the debt arising against him as a result of his collection of the money did not fall within any of the exceptions stated in the 17th section of the bankruptcy act, it not appearing that he stood in any fiduciary relation to the plaintiff, or that he used any false pretense or representation to obtain the money.”

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co.
160 S.E. 639 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Covington v. Rosenbusch
97 S.E. 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 126, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stovall-v-coker-gactapp-1916.