Stovall v. Coker

88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 126, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 161
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1916·No. 6770·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

This case is controlled by the ruling of this court in Glasco v. Cooper, 17 Ga. App. 690 (87 S. E. 1095), in which it was held: “Even though the defendant collected his wages after he had assigned them, and conceding that the assignment was valid, the debt arising against him as a result of his collection of the money did not fall within any of the exceptions stated in the 17th section of the bankruptcy act, it not appearing that he stood in any fiduciary relation to the plaintiff, or that he used any false pretense or representation to obtain the money.”

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stovall v. Coker, 88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 126, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

88 S.E. 907 (Stovall v. Coker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co.
160 S.E. 639 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Covington v. Rosenbusch
97 S.E. 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)