Stovall v. Allums

Eleventh Circuit

Stovall v. Allums

161 F. App'x 828

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 30, 2005

DocketNo. 05-14680; D.C. Docket No. 04-00659-CV-F-S

StatusPublished

This text of 161 F. App'x 828 (Stovall v. Allums) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stovall v. Allums, 161 F. App'x 828 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of qualified immunity stemming from the defendant officer’s arrest of the plaintiff for disorderly conduct. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as we are required to do at this stage of the proceedings, we conclude that no officer reasonably could have believed that the plaintiff had violated the state code provision prohibiting disorderly conduct. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of summary judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of qualified immunity stemming from the defendant officer’s arrest of the plaintiff for disorderly conduct. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as we are required to do at this stage of the proceedings, we conclude that no officer reasonably could have believed that the plaintiff had violated the state code provision prohibiting disorderly conduct. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of summary judgment is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 F. App'x 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stovall-v-allums-ca11-2005.