Stoutamire v. Stoutamire

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stoutamire v. Stoutamire

321 So. 2d 599, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15563

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 1975·No. No. W-514·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel and find no error in the trial court’s award to appellee of lump sum alimony consisting of residential property and also which included the requirement that appellant retire the mortgage indebtedness thereon. We also find no error in the trial court’s award to appellee of a special equity in other real property of appellant resulting from improvements made thereon during the thirty-six year marriage of the parties.

McCORD, Acting C. J., and WILLIS, BEN C., Associate Judge, concur. MILLS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel and find no error in the trial court’s award to appellee of lump sum alimony consisting of residential property and also which included the requirement that appellant retire the mortgage indebtedness thereon. We also find no error in the trial court’s award to appellee of a special equity in other real property of appellant resulting from improvements made thereon during the thirty-six year marriage of the parties.

McCORD, Acting C. J., and WILLIS, BEN C., Associate Judge, concur. MILLS, J., dissents.

Stoutamire v. Stoutamire, 321 So. 2d 599, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15563 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

321 So. 2d 599 (Stoutamire v. Stoutamire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related