STOUT v. STATE OF INDIANA
This text of STOUT v. STATE OF INDIANA (STOUT v. STATE OF INDIANA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
JOHN STOUT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-cv-01448-JPH-DLP ) STATE OF INDIANA, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF'S CUSTODIAN TO FORWARD CERTIFIED COPY OF PLAINTIFF'S SIX-MONTH TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. When Plaintiff filed this lawsuit, he was directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 3. While he has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, that motion is not accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action as required. Plaintiff notes in his motion that the "Jail has not complied with [his] request for [his] transaction history for the six months associated with trust account." Dkt. 5 at 5. When faced with a similar situation, the Seventh Circuit held that the district court should evaluate the veracity or significance of the plaintiff's statement that prison officials refuse to provide the required document and order the prison to provide the trust account statement. Bell v. Kay, 847 F.3d 866, 867 (7th Cir. 2017) (vacating dismissal of prisoner's case due to the district court's failure to assess the truthfulness of plaintiff's assertion that prison officials refused to provide the account ledger to him and the district court's failure to order prison officials to provide the ledger); Goodwill v. Hoffman, 2019 US. Dist. LEXIS 8442 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 17, 2019) (ordering non-party detention center to forward certified copy of plaintiffs six-month trust account statement). The Court has no reason to doubt the veracity of the statements in Plaintiff's motion, which was signed under penalty of perjury. The Court further finds that providing Plaintiff with additional time to continue to request a copy of his trust account statement would be fruitless. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS the Sheriff of Marion County to provide the Court with a certified copy of Plaintiff's trust account statement or the Marion County Jail's institutional equivalent for the six-month period preceding the filing of this action on July 18, 2022, and to do so no later than September 29, 2022. The trust account statement should be submitted to the Clerk of the Court and should reference case number No. 1:22-cv-1448-JPH-DLP. Upon receipt of the required financial statement, the Court will reassess what initial partial filing fee must be paid, if any, and whether a collection order should enter to collect the filing fee. SO ORDERED. Date: 9/2/2022
Distributi omni Patn tanlore istripution: James Patrick Hanlon JOHN STOUT United States District Judge 347010 Southern District of Indiana MARION COUNTY JAIL MARION COUNTY JAIL ADC Mail Room 695 Justice Way Indianapolis, IN 46203 Marion County Sheriff 675 Justice Way Indianapolis, IN 46203
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
STOUT v. STATE OF INDIANA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stout-v-state-of-indiana-insd-2022.