Stout v. Garner Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Stout v. Garner Police Department

671 F. App'x 218

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2016·No. No. 16-7149·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Stout, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stout v. Garner Police Dep’t, No. 5:15-ct-03105-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2016). We deny Appellees’ motion to strike Stout’s pro se supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Stout, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stout v. Garner Police Dep’t, No. 5:15-ct-03105-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2016). We deny Appellees’ motion to strike Stout’s pro se supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Stout v. Garner Police Department, 671 F. App'x 218 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 218 (Stout v. Garner Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related