Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co.
83 A. 1119, 83 N.J.L. 639, 54 Vroom 639, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 203
This text of 83 A. 1119 (Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co., 83 A. 1119, 83 N.J.L. 639, 54 Vroom 639, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 203 (N.J. 1912).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yoorhees in that court.
For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Ykedenwrgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
83 A. 1119, 83 N.J.L. 639, 54 Vroom 639, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stout-v-edison-portland-cement-co-nj-1912.