Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co.
83 A. 1119, 83 N.J.L. 639, 54 Vroom 639, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 203
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 N.J.L. 133 →
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yoorhees in that court.
For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Ykedenwrgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co., 83 A. 1119, 83 N.J.L. 639, 54 Vroom 639, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 203 (N.J. 1912).
83 A. 1119 (Stout v. Edison Portland Cement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.