Stout v. Cook

81 A. 824, 79 N.J. Eq. 640, 9 Buchanan 640, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 21, 1911·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Eor the reasons set forth in the opinion of this court in deciding the appeal of certain others of the parties to this cause, so much of the decree as is appealed from by Audrey Osborn will be affirmed.

For reversal—None. For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom —9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stout v. Cook, 81 A. 824, 79 N.J. Eq. 640, 9 Buchanan 640, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1911).

81 A. 824 (Stout v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Ray
538 P.2d 141 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1975)
Commercial Trust Co. of N.J. v. Adelung
40 A.2d 214 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
In Re Fisler
25 A.2d 265 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Smallwood v. Smallwood
186 A. 775 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
In Re Finkenzeller
146 A. 656 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1929)
Frey v. Nielson
132 A. 765 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)