Stout v. Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc.
This text of 246 A.D.2d 346 (Stout v. Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered on May 20, 1997, which, sua sponte, appointed an independent counsel to represent the ultimate beneficiaries of the Mapplethorpe Foundation (the Foundation), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the appointment vacated.
While we sympathize with the IAS Court’s frustration concerning the apparent conflict of interest underlying the individual plaintiffs pursuit of this potentially protracted litigation in his capacity as the executor of the estate, as well as concerning the failure of the Attorney-General’s office to take a more active role in protecting the Foundation, as beneficiary of the estate, pursuant to the authority granted to it under the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (see, Lefkowitz v Lebensfeld, 51 NY2d 442, 445-446), we must nevertheless find that the court exceeded its statutory authority in appointing an independent counsel to represent the Foundation’s potential beneficiaries (see, Matter of May, 213 AD2d 838, lv dismissed 85 NY2d 1032). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D.2d 346, 666 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stout-v-christie-manson-woods-international-inc-nyappdiv-1998.