Stout v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System, State of Hawaii.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stout v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System, State of Hawaii.. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Haw. 177
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 28, 2017·No. SCAP-15-0000582·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-15-0000582 28-JUL-2017 08:12 AM SCAP-15-0000582

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

ROSEMARY H. STOUT, Appellant-Appellant,

vs.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Appellee-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CAAP-15-0000582; CIV. NO. 14-1-2428-11)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., with Nakayama, J., dissenting separately)

Appellee-Appellee the State of Hawaii timely filed a Motion for Reconsideration (“Motion”) on July 20, 2017, asking this court to reconsider our July 10, 2017 Published Opinion (“Opinion”). This court, having reviewed the Motion, together with the Opinion, and the records and files in this case, and having fully considered the arguments set forth in the Motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 28, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stout v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System, State of Hawaii., (haw 2017).

Stout v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System, State of Hawaii. (Stout v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System, State of Hawaii.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.