Stoughton v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stoughton v. Cohen

258 A.D. 746, 15 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6740

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 746 (Stoughton v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stoughton v. Cohen, 258 A.D. 746, 15 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order denying application of petitioner for an order requiring respondents to refrain from taking any proceedings to place upon the ballots or voting machines in the city of New York for the election of November 7, 1939, a proposal to amend article 1, section 9, of the Constitution of the State of New York. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Taylor and Close, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the application on the ground that the provisions of the Constitution of the State of New York (art. 19, § 1) are controlling and there has been no compliance with said provisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order denying application of petitioner for an order requiring respondents to refrain from taking any proceedings to place upon the ballots or voting machines in the city of New York for the election of November 7, 1939, a proposal to amend article 1, section 9, of the Constitution of the State of New York. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Taylor and Close, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the application on the ground that the provisions of the Constitution of the State of New York (art. 19, § 1) are controlling and there has been no compliance with said provisions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 746, 15 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoughton-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1939.