Stough v. Smith

50 Ind. 250
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Downey, J.

Action by the appellee against the appellant. The complaint is in four paragraphs. The sufficiency of the several paragraphs is called in question, but we have concluded that it is unnecessary to decide the questions thus presented, as, upon a careful reading of the evidence in support of them, we have come to the conclusion thai: it is wholly insufficient. The case is not one where there is a conflict of evidence merely, but there is no evidence, at all satisfactory, of the essential [251]*251allegations of the complaint. In such a case, it is our imperative duty to reverse the judgment.

Some errors occurring during the trial are alleged, but they need not be examined.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stough v. Smith, 50 Ind. 250 (Ind. 1875).

50 Ind. 250 (Stough v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McConnell v. Citizens' State Bank of Petersburgh
27 N.E. 616 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)