Stoudenmire v. Ware
48 Ala. 589
Opinion
B. F. SAFFOLD, J.
Under the evidence disclosed in the bill of exceptions, the note, the foundation of the action, was without consideration.—Williams v. Sims, 22 Ala. 512; Beall & Co. v. Ridgway, 18 Ala. 117. The court below, therefore, erred in the charge given, and in its refusal to charge as requested.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stoudenmire v. Ware, 48 Ala. 589 (Ala. 1872).
48 Ala. 589 (Stoudenmire v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beall & Co. v. Ridgeway
18 Ala. 117 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1850)
Williams v. Sims
22 Ala. 512 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1853)