Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department

762 F.2d 1011
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department. Read the opinion of the Court — 679 F.2d 541
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 13, 1985·No. 1011_1·Unpublished

Opinion

762 F.2d 1011

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

CARL W. STOTTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMLARLY SITUATED, AND FRED L. JONES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES,
v.
MEMPHIS FIRE DEPARTMENT; ROBERT W. WALKER, CITY OF MEMPHIS,
AND JOSEPH SABATINI, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS (81-5349),
FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL UNION 1784,
DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR-APPELLANT (81-5349).

NO. 81-5348, 81-5349

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

3/13/85

ORDER

ON REMAND from the United States Supreme Court.

THIS CAUSE has been returned to this Court subsequent to a decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court reversing this Court's prior decision.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered by this Court that the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee for disposition in conformity with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department, 762 F.2d 1011 (6th Cir. 1985).

762 F.2d 1011 (Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.