Stott v. Hotaling

65 N.E.2d 101, 295 N.Y. 664, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 868
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.E.2d 101 (Stott v. Hotaling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stott v. Hotaling, 65 N.E.2d 101, 295 N.Y. 664, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 868 (N.Y. 1946).

Opinion

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered on the stipulation against the appellant, unless appellant stipulate and be ready to try the issues herein involved at the next Trial Term of the Supreme Court held in and for the County of Albany, in which event the appeal may be withdrawn without costs. No opinion.

Concur; Loughran, Oh. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Med alie, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.E.2d 101, 295 N.Y. 664, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stott-v-hotaling-ny-1946.