Story v. . Truitt

138 S.E. 121, 193 N.C. 851, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 500
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 18, 1927·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At April Term, 1923, a compulsory reference in the above entitled action was ordered by the court below, and L. J. Lawrence, Esquire, was appointed referee. The record, which imports verity, shows that no exception was taken by the plaintiff to the reference. *852 The right to a jury trial was waived. Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N. C., p. 515; Baker v. Edwards, 176 N. C., 229; Jenkins v. Parker, 192 N. C., 188; Burroughs v. Umstead, ante, 842.

“It is the accepted position with us that the findings of fact by a referee, concurred in by the judge, are conclusive when there is competent evidence to sustain them.” Comrs. v. Abee Bros., 175 N. C., 701; Hardy v. Thornton, 192 N. C., p. 296; Cotton Mills v. Cotton Yarn Co., ibid., p. 713.

Upon a careful perusal of the record, there was competent evidence to sustain the findings of fact by the referee. The court below, in its judgment, set forth that exceptions of plaintiff were overruled, and “hereby confirms and adopts the findings of fact and conclusions of law. set forth in said report of the referee as fully and in the same manner as if herein recited.”

For the reasons given, the judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Story v. . Truitt, 138 S.E. 121, 193 N.C. 851, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 500 (N.C. 1927).

138 S.E. 121 (Story v. . Truitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartlett v. Hopkins
69 S.E.2d 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Smith v. . Land Bank
192 S.E. 866 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Smith v. Atlantic Joint Stock & Bank of Raleigh
212 N.C. 79 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
State v. . Ellis
156 S.E. 157 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)