Story v. Strawberry Growers Selling Co.

4 La. App. 467, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 163
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 26, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 4 La. App. 467 (Story v. Strawberry Growers Selling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Story v. Strawberry Growers Selling Co., 4 La. App. 467, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 163 (La. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

LECHE, J.

This suit is practically analogous to that of Puleston vs. the same defendant, this day decided.

The claim for rent here, is two hundred and twenty-five dollars and plaintiff seeks to hold defendant responsible as factor of Sam Lascare, upon grounds similar to those alleged in the Puleston case. While the facts are not exactly identical, the evidence does not take the case out of the rule recognized by this court in the case of Puleston and the decision herein is controlled by the principle therein announced.

For these reasons the judgment herein should be affirmed and

it is ' so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 La. App. 467, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/story-v-strawberry-growers-selling-co-lactapp-1926.