Story v. Hunter

193 F.2d 874
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 1952
Docket4373_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 F.2d 874 (Story v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Story v. Hunter, 193 F.2d 874 (10th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order discharging a writ of habeas corpus.

All of the issues presented have been adjudged adversely to the petitioner on prior applications for writs of habeas corpus. See Wallace v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 149 F.2d 59; Story v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 158 F.2d 825; and Story v. Hunter, No. 1571, D.C.Kan., order entered March 21, 1951.

Under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244, the trial court was not required to entertain the application.

Moreover, it appeared that the petitioner had applied for and had been denied relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, and the application contained no allegations making it appear that the remedy by motion under § 2255 was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Settle
214 F. Supp. 779 (W.D. Missouri, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 F.2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/story-v-hunter-ca10-1952.