Story v. Howes

41 A.D.2d 925, 344 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4395
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 22, 1973·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County entered on December 26, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, and vacated, and a new trial directed, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event. The plaintiff, aged 11 at the time, sustained injuries as he rode his bicycle north on Broadway in Manhattan, when the rear wheel of his bicycle was struck by the defendant’s ear coming from the intersection at 120th Street and Broadway. The jury having found for the defendant, the only question is as to certain aspects of the charge. While there may have been some errors, not likely to recur, that portion of the charge, that allowed the jury to consider the question of assumption of risk, was erroneous. The mere riding of a bicycle does not mean the assumption of risk by the rider that he may be hit by a car. (Cf. Bloom v. Dalu Corp., 269 App. Div. 192.) Concur — Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Lane, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Story v. Howes, 41 A.D.2d 925, 344 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 925 (Story v. Howes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moser v. Ratinoff
130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 198 (California Court of Appeal, 2003)
Thomas v. Holliday by and Through Holliday
1988 OK 116 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1988)