Story v. First National Bank
This text of 128 S.E. 12 (Story v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a general demurrer to a plea is overruled and no exception to this ruling is taken, the ruling becomes the law of the case and “stands as a solemn adjudication that the plea was good.” Bennett v. Simmons, 30 Ga. App. 531 (118 S. E. 494), and citations. Where, on the trial of such a case, the defendant introduces evidence which substantially supports her plea, even though the plaintiff introduces conflicting evidence, it is error for the judge to direct a verdict for the plaintiff. Pierpont Mfg. Co. v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 153 Ga. 455, and cases cited on pages 457 and 458 (112 S. E. 462) ; Vickery v. Swicord, 151 Ga. 145 (106 S. E. 92).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 S.E. 12, 34 Ga. App. 27, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/story-v-first-national-bank-gactapp-1925.