Story v. Derby

23 F. Cas. 171, 4 McLean 160
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
DecidedJuly 15, 1846
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F. Cas. 171 (Story v. Derby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Story v. Derby, 23 F. Cas. 171, 4 McLean 160 (circtdoh 1846).

Opinion

McLEAN, Circuit Justice.

This is an application for a preliminary injunction, which, having been argued, the court adopted the following order: This day came the parties, by their solicitors, and the motion on behalf of the complainants for a preliminary injunction to restrain the publication of the book of the respondent, named in the bill, and answers, and affidavits; and having heard the arguments of counsel, and deliberated on the same, do order that the injunction prayed for be not granted. And it is further ordered, that the case stand referred to Master Commissioner Mansfield, for examination and report — that is to say:

1. Whether the book of Mr. Holcombe contains any portion, and if so, what portion, of the commentaries of the late Justice Story, described in the bill, showing fully the similarities or coincidences of the book of the respondents, with the commentaries, as well in arrangement and plan as in matter; and whether, in the points of coincidence between the two books, in the matter, plan, or arrangement, in which the similarity, if any, is found, was original in the commentaries of Judge Story.

2. Whether the book of the defendants is a fair and bona fide abridgment of the commentaries of the complainant, or a colorable one, calculated to supersede the use of the commentaries to any considerable extent.

3. Upon such other matters, relating to the matters in controversy, as either party may request him to examine and report upon. And in making said report, the said master may use the original papers on file, or such as either party may place on file, and may, in aid of his examination, summon such persons as he may deem expedient, and report the testimony so taken, if any, to the next term of this court. The said master may proceed to said examination at any time agreed upon by the parties; or, in case no such agreement is entered into, then at such time as the said master may fix, giving the amount of the parties at least ten days’ notice of such time. Either party may proceed to take testimony for the final hearing of the cause, as they might do if this order of reference had never been made. And for the coming in of the report, and further proceedings in the premises, this cause stands continued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F. Cas. 171, 4 McLean 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/story-v-derby-circtdoh-1846.