Story v. Black

119 U.S. 235, 7 S. Ct. 176, 30 L. Ed. 341, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1981
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 15, 1886·No. 39·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mu. Chief Justice' Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the Territory. of Montana to bring up for review the judgment- in a suit where there was not a; trial by jury. Under the Act of April-7; 1874, c.' 80, §-2, 18 Stat. 27,'the case should .have *237 -been brought up by appeal’ and the writ of error' is therefore dismissed. Hecht v. Boughton, 105. U. S. 235; United States v. Railroad Co., 105 U. S. 263; Woolf v. Hamilton, 108 U. S. 15. The question is no longer opeh in this' court. ' The statutory rule is jurisdictional.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Story v. Black, 119 U.S. 235, 7 S. Ct. 176, 30 L. Ed. 341, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1981 (1886).

119 U.S. 235 (Story v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co. v. Bradbury
132 U.S. 509 (Supreme Court, 1889)
First National Bank v. McAndrews
7 Mont. 434 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)