Storrs v. Wetmore

1 Kirby 203
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1787
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 203 (Storrs v. Wetmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Storrs v. Wetmore, 1 Kirby 203 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).

Opinion

This was an action on the case, by a freighter of goods on board a ship belonging to the defendant, for the misfeasance of the navigator.

Plea in abatement — That one Kichard Spellman was joint owner with the defendant, and equally accountable for the conduct of the master, and ought to have been joined in the action; on which issue was taken.

On the trial of this issue, testimony was offered to prove, that Spellman, since the commencement of the suit, had confessed himself to be joint owner with the defendant.- — • But, the court said it was inadmissible — That the same point had been deliberately determined in the case of Hamlin v. Fitch, at "Windham, last term.

It was then moved, that Spellman himself might be permitted to testify.— And, the court said, that any one might be permitted voluntarily to testify against his interest, though he could not be compelled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Kirby 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storrs-v-wetmore-connsuperct-1787.