Storrs & Bement Co. v. Wingate
29 A. 413, 67 N.H. 190
This text of 29 A. 413 (Storrs & Bement Co. v. Wingate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Storrs & Bement Co. v. Wingate, 29 A. 413, 67 N.H. 190 (N.H. 1892).
Opinion
The contract of a married woman as surety for her husband is invalid. Gen. Laws, a. 183, s. 12. The fact that another is bound with the defendant’s husband for the payment of the note does not render her undertaking any the less a contract of suretyship for him. Stokell v. Kimball, 59 N. H. 13.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Union National Bank of Chicago v. Chapman
7 A.D. 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 A. 413, 67 N.H. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storrs-bement-co-v-wingate-nh-1892.