Storrs & Bement Co. v. Wingate

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Storrs & Bement Co. v. Wingate

29 A. 413, 67 N.H. 190

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The contract of a married woman as surety for her husband is invalid. Gen. Laws, a. 183, s. 12. The fact that another is bound with the defendant’s husband for the payment of the note does not render her undertaking any the less a contract of suretyship for him. Stokell v. Kimball, 59 N. H. 13.

Judgment for the defendant.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter, J.

The contract of a married woman as surety for her husband is invalid. Gen. Laws, a. 183, s. 12. The fact that another is bound with the defendant’s husband for the payment of the note does not render her undertaking any the less a contract of suretyship for him. Stokell v. Kimball, 59 N. H. 13.

Judgment for the defendant.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Storrs & Bement Co. v. Wingate, 29 A. 413, 67 N.H. 190 (N.H. 1892).

Pincite

29 A. 413 (Storrs & Bement Co. v. Wingate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related