Storr, Ellsworth Swaindell v. State
This text of Storr, Ellsworth Swaindell v. State (Storr, Ellsworth Swaindell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed and Opinion filed June 12, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-01017-CR
ELLSWORTH SWAINDELL STORR, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 9th District Court
Waller County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 98-02-9311
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Ellsworth Swaindell Storr was found guilty of the offense of aggravated robbery, and sentenced to seven years= confinement and a $2,500.00 fine.
Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record. Although a copy of the record was furnished to appellant, no pro se response has been filed.
We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed June 12, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Hudson, and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Storr, Ellsworth Swaindell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storr-ellsworth-swaindell-v-state-texapp-2003.