Storman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Storman v. State

623 So. 2d 869, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9426, 1993 WL 356826

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2612

StatusPublished

This text of 623 So. 2d 869 (Storman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Storman v. State, 623 So. 2d 869, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9426, 1993 WL 356826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Storman appeals the judgment and sentence entered following his nolo con-tendere plea pursuant to his written plea agreement with the State. Our review of the record reveals discrepancies between the plea agreement, the oral pronouncements at the sentencing hearing, and the written judgment. All of these matters could and should have been directed to the trial court for clarification and correction, which would have eliminated the necessity for this appeal.

The appellant’s convictions are affirmed. However, the sentences on Counts I, IV, and V are reversed and this cause is remanded for resentencing in accordance with the plea agreement.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED for resentencing.

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Storman appeals the judgment and sentence entered following his nolo con-tendere plea pursuant to his written plea agreement with the State. Our review of the record reveals discrepancies between the plea agreement, the oral pronouncements at the sentencing hearing, and the written judgment. All of these matters could and should have been directed to the trial court for clarification and correction, which would have eliminated the necessity for this appeal.

The appellant’s convictions are affirmed. However, the sentences on Counts I, IV, and V are reversed and this cause is remanded for resentencing in accordance with the plea agreement.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED for resentencing.

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 So. 2d 869, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9426, 1993 WL 356826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storman-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.