Storm v. Newsom

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 DIMITRI Z. STORM, Case No. 23-cv-00889-AMO (PR) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 Vv. WITH PREJUDICE 10 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., ll Defendants. 12 On November 14, 2023, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff Dimitri Z. Storm’s 5 13 || complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. 14. The Court informed Storm that failure to timely file an 14 || amended complaint within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of his action with 3 15 || prejudice. See id. Twenty-eight days have passed, and Storm has not filed an amended complaint a 16 || or communicated with the Court in any manner. 3 17 Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 18 Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 989, 992 (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal of 19 || action with prejudice when plaintiff failed to amend complaint after receiving leave to do so, 20 || because expeditious resolution of litigation, court’s need to manage its docket, and avoiding 21 || prejudice to defendants favored dismissal). 22 The Clerk of the Court shall terminate all pending motions and close the file. 24 || Dated: February 12, 2024 25 Qaacl Wale 26 ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN United States District Judge 27 28