Storm v. Gair
This text of 212 A.D. 829 (Storm v. Gair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed [830]*830upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The fact that this is an action for negligence is not, in the opinion of this court, a ground for refusing or limiting an examination before trial. (Middleton v. Boardman, 210 App. Div. 467.) Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., .dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 A.D. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storm-v-gair-nyappdiv-1925.