Storm v. Armour
This text of 248 N.W. 491 (Storm v. Armour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has appealed from a judgment based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court. The plaintiff has attempted to file a cross-appeal from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial. The record is confused. It is apparent, however, that the findings of fact will not support the conclusions of law or judgment.
The case is reversed, and a new trial ordered. Costs will be taxed in this court against the plaintiff below.
RUDOLPH, P.J., and POLLEY, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, and WARREN, JJ., concur. *Page 305
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 N.W. 491, 61 S.D. 304, 1933 S.D. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storm-v-armour-sd-1933.