Storm-Conley v. Meyer Transportation

Missouri Court of Appeals

Storm-Conley v. Meyer Transportation

390 S.W.3d 266, 2013 WL 327315, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 107

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. ED 98766·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Neva Storm-Conley, Rhonda Berning, and Julie Barnett (“Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Bank of Edwards-ville (“Bank”) in Appellants’ lawsuit alleging a “civil conspiracy” against the Bank and other defendants. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Neva Storm-Conley, Rhonda Berning, and Julie Barnett (“Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Bank of Edwards-ville (“Bank”) in Appellants’ lawsuit alleging a “civil conspiracy” against the Bank and other defendants. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Storm-Conley v. Meyer Transportation, 390 S.W.3d 266, 2013 WL 327315, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 107 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

390 S.W.3d 266 (Storm-Conley v. Meyer Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.