Stork v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of Pythias of the World

84 N.W. 721, 113 Iowa 724
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 22, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 84 N.W. 721 (Stork v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of Pythias of the World) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stork v. Supreme Lodge of Knights of Pythias of the World, 84 N.W. 721, 113 Iowa 724 (iowa 1900).

Opinion

Ladd, J.

1 2 3 The petition alleged that defendant “is a life insurance company, and duly incorporated as such.” . The answer is hut a general denial, with an averment of fraud in the procurement of the certificate. No facts are specially pleaded, as required by section 3628 of the Code, to put in issue the defendant’s capacity as alleged. Nor was any evidence offered tending to prove its organization as that of a fraternal society. In these circumstances it must be treated as an insurance company, and, as the application was not indorsed on the certificate, it was rightly rejected when offered in evidence. Cook v. Association, 74 Iowa, 746. But, even if defendant were conceded to be a fraternal society, section 2, chapter 211, of the Acts of the Eighteenth General Assembly, requiring the application to be copied on the policy, was expressly held applicable to such organizations in Grimes v. Legion of Honor, 97 Iowa, 315. See, also McConnell v. Association, 79 Iowa, 760. That the legislature has seen fit to classify such societies as were considered in the Grimes Case, enacting provisions for them alone, including one relating to copying the applications, furnishes no ground for departing from that decision. Whatever may be thought of legislative construction, it is not to be given weight as against a previous ruling of this court.

[726]*7264 II. The medical examiner’s report was not offered in evidence, and defendant admitted having no proof of any statements by the assured other than those contained in the application. There were no representations then to be proven false, and the evidence of physicians, tending to show that he was suffering from a disease subsequently resulting in death, was rightly excluded. — Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weibel v. Boston Piano & Music Co.
181 Iowa 199 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Tusant v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen
183 Iowa 489 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Salmon v. Farm Property Mutual Insurance
168 Iowa 521 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915)
Sargent v. Modern Brotherhood of America
148 Iowa 600 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1910)
Krause v. Modern Woodmen of America
110 N.W. 452 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1907)
Brown v. Modern Woodmen
88 N.W. 965 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 N.W. 721, 113 Iowa 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stork-v-supreme-lodge-of-knights-of-pythias-of-the-world-iowa-1900.