Storey v. Commissioner

1972 T.C. Memo. 236, 31 T.C.M. 1162, 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedNovember 27, 1972
DocketDocket No. 329-70.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1972 T.C. Memo. 236 (Storey v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Storey v. Commissioner, 1972 T.C. Memo. 236, 31 T.C.M. 1162, 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23 (tax 1972).

Opinion

BEN C. STOREY and MARY F. STOREY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Storey v. Commissioner
Docket No. 329-70.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1972-236; 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23; 31 T.C.M. (CCH) 1162; T.C.M. (RIA) 72236;
November 27, 1972, Filed
Ben C. Storey, pro se. Donald W. Williamson, Jr., for the respondent.

WITHEY

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WITHEY, Judge: The Commissioner has determined a deficiency in the income tax of petitioners for the taxable year 1967 in the amount of $8,459.31. The issue*24 before the Court is whether a loss suffered by petitioners upon the becoming worthless of certain stock issued to them constitutes an ordinary loss under section 1244 of the Code 1 as contended by petitioners or a long-term capital loss as determined by respondent.

FINDINGS OF FACT

All stipulated facts are found as stipulated.

The petitioners, Ben C. Storey and Mary F. Storey, were husband and wife during all times pertinent hereto and resided in Titusville, Florida, at the time of the filing of the petition herein. They filed a joint Federal income tax return for the calendar year 1967 with the district director of internal revenue, Jacksonville, Florida. Since Mary F. Storey is a party to this proceeding solely because a joint return was filed, Ben C. Storey will usually hereinafter be referred to as petitioner.

On or about August 12, 1964, a corporation known as Superior Cabinets and Supply, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Superior), was organized under the laws of the State of Florida with authorized capital of 1,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $10 per share. *25 It filed its United States corporate income tax returns for its fiscal years ended May 31, 1965, through May 31, 1967, respectively, with the district director of internal revenue, Jacksonville, Florida.

On August 14, 1964, 100 shares of Superior's stock were issued for cash to the following persons who remained as its stockholders until its dissolution:

Stock certificateno.StockholderNumber ofshares
1(cancelled)
2Mary F. Storey1
3Margaret Starrick1
4Ben C. Storey 98
Total shares100

The officers of Superior throughout its existence were as follows:

Ben C. StoreyPresident
Mary F. StoreySecretary-treasurer
Margaret StarrickVice president
These three individuals also comprised Superior's board of directors during its existence.

Margaret Starrick was at all times pertinent hereto a resident of Titusville, Florida, and employed by Titusville Medical Clinic, Inc., a medical clinic comprised of petitioner and certain other medical doctors in Titusville, Florida.

From its inception, Superior was undercapitalized and was financially unsuccessful thereafter. Commencing on June 9, 1964, prior to its incorporation*26 and continuing through May 15, 1967, petitioner made cash advances (by checks) to Superior in the total amount of $18,960.64.

Superior issued to petitioner 11 promissory notes bearing dates ranging from May 31, 1965, through May 15, 1967, in the aggregate amount of $17,915.63.

All of such notes were prepared and issued after the Internal Revenue Service began its audit in this case. All of the notes were unsecured, there were no fixed repayment dates as to the advances represented thereby, and no interest was ever accrued or paid to petitioner on such notes.

Superior's minute book reflects that on June 30, 1965, its board of directors held a special meeting to adopt a stock plan that would qualify under section 1244 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. Minutes of that meeting read, in pertinent part, as follows:

The secretary then distributed a plan for the sale of unsubscribed and unissued stock. The corporation year end financial statement was present.

Upon motion duly made and carried, the said plan was ordered filed with the secretary and spread upon the minutes, said plan being as follows:

For the protection of stockholders it is suggested that*27 a sale of unissued stock be made. The Corporation financial statement indicates, the amount of the offering together with all contributions to capital does not exceed $500,000, also, the amount to be paid for the offering together with all corporate equity capital does not exceed $1,000,000. The aggregate amount of the offering is of 900 shares of common stock for a maximum amount of $18,900.00. This offer is to expire not later than 2 years from the date of adoption of this plan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1972 T.C. Memo. 236, 31 T.C.M. 1162, 1972 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storey-v-commissioner-tax-1972.