Storette v. Storette
This text of 11 A.D.3d 365 (Storette v. Storette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John E.H. Stackhouse, J.), entered August 22, 2003, dissolving the parties’ marriage and incorporating the parties’ settlement agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs open-court stipulation contained all of the material terms of an enforceable agreement, any unstated amounts being objectively ascertainable, and was properly enforced absent a showing of fraud, duress or mistake sufficient to invalidate a contract (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]). It does not avail plaintiff that she refused to sign the subsequent writing embodying the terms of the oral stipulation (see Friedman v Garey, 8 AD3d 129 [2004]). We have considered and rejected plaintiff’s other arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Lerner and Sweeny, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D.3d 365, 784 N.Y.S.2d 34, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storette-v-storette-nyappdiv-2004.