Stores v. Stores
1 Root 139
Opinion
'The order may properly be charged on book, and the plaintiff be allowed to swear to it, it being an article of commerce; there is a wide difference between an action brought upon an order or -bill of exchange, and a.n action brought for an order or bill of exchange.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stores v. Stores, 1 Root 139 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).
1 Root 139 (Stores v. Stores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cogswell v. Dolliver
2 Mass. 217 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1806)