Stores v. Snow
1 Root 181
This text of 1 Root 181 (Stores v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stores v. Snow, 1 Root 181 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
Opinion
[182]*182The defendant offered evidence to prove that both the note, and the mortgage given to secure it, were fraudulent, and done to avoid creditors. But by the court not admitted, for a fraudulent conveyance is good between the parties; although it is void as to creditors.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bouton v. Beers
62 A. 619 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stores-v-snow-connsuperct-1790.