Storer v. Hinkly

1 Root 182
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 15, 1790·Published

Opinion

The court disaffirmed the decree of probate in part, viz. as to rents and profits arising upon leases given in the lifetime of the deceased; and affirmed it as to the rest. Writ of error was after brought to the Supreme Court of Errors, and the judgment was reversed as to the charges which were allowed for selling the lands in the state of Vermont.

Root, J., excused himself from judging in this case, having been heretofore concerned as counsel for Hinkly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Storer v. Hinkly, 1 Root 182 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 182 (Storer v. Hinkly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.