Storer v. Hinkly

Connecticut Superior Court

Storer v. Hinkly

1 Root 182

DecidedMarch 15, 1790

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 182 (Storer v. Hinkly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Storer v. Hinkly, 1 Root 182 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Pincite

Opinion

The court disaffirmed the decree of probate in part, viz. as to rents and profits arising upon leases given in the lifetime of the deceased; and affirmed it as to the rest. Writ of error was after brought to the Supreme Court of Errors, and the judgment was reversed as to the charges which were allowed for selling the lands in the state of Vermont.

Root, J., excused himself from judging in this case, having been heretofore concerned as counsel for Hinkly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court disaffirmed the decree of probate in part, viz. as to rents and profits arising upon leases given in the lifetime of the deceased; and affirmed it as to the rest. Writ of error was after brought to the Supreme Court of Errors, and the judgment was reversed as to the charges which were allowed for selling the lands in the state of Vermont.

Root, J., excused himself from judging in this case, having been heretofore concerned as counsel for Hinkly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storer-v-hinkly-connsuperct-1790.