Home/Supreme Court/Storer v. Brown

Storer v. Brown

412 U.S. 904, 93 S. Ct. 2287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Storer v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 415 U.S. 724 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 21, 1973·No. No. 72-812; No. 72-6050·Published

Opinion

Appeals from D. C. N. D. Cal. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 410 U. S. 965.] Motion of appellants in No. 72-812 for divided argument granted. It is ordered that Paul N. Halvonik, Esquire, and Joseph Remcho, Esquire, be permitted to present oral argument in the consolidated cases. Motion of appellant in No. 72-6050 to argue orally pro se denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Storer v. Brown, 412 U.S. 904, 93 S. Ct. 2287 (1973).

412 U.S. 904 (Storer v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.