Storck v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
27 Jones & S. 588, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588
Opinion
The question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to require the" trial judge to find certain requests. The Court (per Curiam) held it insufficient and affirmed the judgment, with costs..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Storck v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co., 27 Jones & S. 588, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
27 Jones & S. 588 (Storck v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.