Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation

S.D. New York

Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation

DecidedOctober 24, 2022

Docket1:21-cv-07549

StatusUnknown

This text of Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation (Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CHAIM STORCH, Plaintiff, 21-CV-7549 (JPO) -v- ORDER 2 EAST 70TH STREET CORPORATION, Defendant.

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The Court has been notified that the parties have reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The parties are advised that they may not dismiss this action with prejudice unless the settlement agreement has been approved by either the Court or the Department of Labor. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015). Any letter motion, along with the settlement agreement, must be filed on the public docket within thirty days of this order. The letter motion must explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and should discuss, at a minimum, the following factors: (1) the plaintiff’s range of possible recovery; (2) the extent to which “the settlement will enable the parties to avoid anticipated burdens and expenses in establishing their respective claims and defenses”; (3) the seriousness of the litigation risks faced by the parties; (4) whether “the settlement agreement is the product of arm's-length bargaining between experienced counsel”; and (5) the possibility of fraud or collusion. Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (quoting Medley v. Am. Cancer Soc., No. 10 Civ. 3214, 2010 WL 3000028, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2010)). The letter must also address whether there is a bona fide dispute as to the number of hours worked or the amount of compensation due and how much of the proposed settlement plaintiff’s attorney shall be seeking as fees. Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 203, 206. Absent special circumstances, the Court will not approve any settlement agreement that is filed under seal or in redacted form. /d. at 206. The parties are directed to file a letter or stipulation, in accordance with the instructions above, on or before December 1, 2022. All other filing deadlines, conference dates, and the trial date are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2022 New York, New York

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CHAIM STORCH, Plaintiff, 21-CV-7549 (JPO) -v- ORDER 2 EAST 70TH STREET CORPORATION, Defendant.

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The Court has been notified that the parties have reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The parties are advised that they may not dismiss this action with prejudice unless the settlement agreement has been approved by either the Court or the Department of Labor. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015). Any letter motion, along with the settlement agreement, must be filed on the public docket within thirty days of this order. The letter motion must explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and should discuss, at a minimum, the following factors: (1) the plaintiff’s range of possible recovery; (2) the extent to which “the settlement will enable the parties to avoid anticipated burdens and expenses in establishing their respective claims and defenses”; (3) the seriousness of the litigation risks faced by the parties; (4) whether “the settlement agreement is the product of arm's-length bargaining between experienced counsel”; and (5) the possibility of fraud or collusion. Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (quoting Medley v. Am. Cancer Soc., No. 10 Civ. 3214, 2010 WL 3000028, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2010)). The letter must also address whether there is a bona fide dispute as to the number of hours worked or the amount of compensation due and how much of the proposed settlement plaintiff’s attorney shall be seeking as fees. Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 203, 206. Absent special circumstances, the Court will not approve any settlement agreement that is filed under seal or in redacted form. /d. at 206. The parties are directed to file a letter or stipulation, in accordance with the instructions above, on or before December 1, 2022. All other filing deadlines, conference dates, and the trial date are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2022 New York, New York

United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/storch-v-2-east-70th-street-corporation-nysd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack