Stopyra v. Ward Baking Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Stopyra v. Ward Baking Company

182 A. 361, 320 Pa. 260, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 585

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 5, 1935

DocketAppeal, 332

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A. 361 (Stopyra v. Ward Baking Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stopyra v. Ward Baking Company, 182 A. 361, 320 Pa. 260, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 585 (Pa. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

At the trial of this action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile collision, the jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed from the refusal of the court below to award a new trial. After a full examination of the record, including the notes of testimony and the charge of the court, we find no reason for disturbing the verdict. Moreover, we are convinced the decision reached by the jury was clearly warranted under the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

At the trial of this action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile collision, the jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed from the refusal of the court below to award a new trial. After a full examination of the record, including the notes of testimony and the charge of the court, we find no reason for disturbing the verdict. Moreover, we are convinced the decision reached by the jury was clearly warranted under the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A. 361, 320 Pa. 260, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stopyra-v-ward-baking-company-pa-1935.