STOPPELMANN v. Sargent

Missouri Court of Appeals

STOPPELMANN v. Sargent

195 S.W.3d 448, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 955, 2006 WL 1737622

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 27, 2006

DocketED 87079

StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.W.3d 448 (STOPPELMANN v. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

STOPPELMANN v. Sargent, 195 S.W.3d 448, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 955, 2006 WL 1737622 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey M. Stoppelmann appeals from the judgment of the trial court following a jury verdict that awarded him $2,764 in damages for his claims. Stoppelmann contends that the trial court plainly erred in not granting his motion for a new trial in that the jury verdict was shockingly inadequate, the result of confusion and prejudice, and against the weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI