Stop, Inc. v. State
This text of 254 S.E.2d 463 (Stop, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A jury found appellant guilty of two counts of violating Code Ann. § 26-2101 (c). This appeal follows.
1. Appellant’s constitutional attack on Code Ann. § 26-2101 (c), his challenge to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized without a warrant, and his complaint as to the jury charge concerning scienter have been considered and decided adversely to appellant in Sewell v. State, 238 Ga. 495 (1), (2), (4) (233 SE2d 187). See also Teal v. State, 143 Ga. App. 47 (238 SE2d 128).
2. We have reviewed the magazine and various devices forming the basis of this prosecution. The materials fall within the definition of Code Ann. § 26-2101 (b), (c), and are, accordingly, obscene as a matter of law. See, e.g., Pierce v. State, 145 Ga. App. 680 (1) (244 SE2d 589).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 S.E.2d 463, 149 Ga. App. 306, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stop-inc-v-state-gactapp-1979.