Stoney v. MacDougall
232 S.E.2d 208, 291 N.C. 716, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1272
This text of 232 S.E.2d 208 (Stoney v. MacDougall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stoney v. MacDougall, 232 S.E.2d 208, 291 N.C. 716, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1272 (N.C. 1977).
Opinion
Mary Kistler STONEY et al.
v.
Roderick M. MacDOUGALL, Trustee under the Will of Andrew M. Kistler, et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Everett, Everett, Creech & Craven, Wayne W. Martin, for defendant.
Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson, for plaintiff.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 31 N.C.App. 678, 230 S.E.2d 592. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stoney v. MacDougall
230 S.E.2d 592 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 S.E.2d 208, 291 N.C. 716, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoney-v-macdougall-nc-1977.