Stoney v. M. MacDOUGALL
222 S.E.2d 702, 289 N.C. 302, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1286
This text of 222 S.E.2d 702 (Stoney v. M. MacDOUGALL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stoney v. M. MacDOUGALL, 222 S.E.2d 702, 289 N.C. 302, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1286 (N.C. 1976).
Opinion
Mary Kistler STONEY et al.
v.
Roderick M. MacDOUGALL, Trustee, et al. (Wayne W. Martin, Guardian Ad Litem for Elizabeth M. Stahl).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Wayne W. Martin, in pro. per.
Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson, Everett, Everett, Creech & Craven, for plaintiffs.
*703 Petition by defendant, Wayne W. Martin, for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 28 N.C.App. 178, 220 S.E.2d 368. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stoney v. MacDougall
220 S.E.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
222 S.E.2d 702, 289 N.C. 302, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoney-v-m-macdougall-nc-1976.