Stoney v. M. MacDOUGALL
222 S.E.2d 702, 289 N.C. 302, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1286
Opinion
Mary Kistler STONEY et al.
v.
Roderick M. MacDOUGALL, Trustee, et al. (Wayne W. Martin, Guardian Ad Litem for Elizabeth M. Stahl).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Wayne W. Martin, in pro. per.
Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson, Everett, Everett, Creech & Craven, for plaintiffs.
*703 Petition by defendant, Wayne W. Martin, for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 28 N.C.App. 178, 220 S.E.2d 368. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stoney v. M. MacDOUGALL, 222 S.E.2d 702, 289 N.C. 302, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1286 (N.C. 1976).
222 S.E.2d 702 (Stoney v. M. MacDOUGALL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stoney v. MacDougall
220 S.E.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)