Stonewall Manufacturing Co. v. Peek
This text of 63 Miss. 342 (Stonewall Manufacturing Co. v. Peek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The right of the appellant to institute the action upon a contract by its agent is clear, and the testimony is undisputed that the contract was made for the appellant.
It should have been left to the jury to find whether the eight bales were delivered and received and paid for, in pursuance and fulfillment of the oral contract previously made for forty bales of cotton. The oral contract, made for forty bales, to average five hundred pounds each, at ten cents per pound, is proved, and if the delivery and receipt four days later of eight bales of the forty was in part performance of the previous contract, the statute of frauds was satisfied. If the part received was as part of the whole in reference to and in pursuance of the oral contract, it was thereby made valid. Section 1295 of the code.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Miss. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stonewall-manufacturing-co-v-peek-miss-1885.