Stoner v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 783
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 13, 1966
DocketNo. P66/97; No. P66/98
StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 783 (Stoner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stoner v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 783 (cusc 1966).

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of blocked or trimmed palm leaf harvest hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of Bailey-Mora Co., Inc., a/c Vera Lou, Inc., et al. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 55, C.D. 2508), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 55 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Cust. Ct. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoner-v-united-states-cusc-1966.