Stoner v. Patten
This text of 71 S.E. 802 (Stoner v. Patten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition in this ease having been brought by a lower riparian owner for injunction to restrain the taking of water from a stream which the petitioner alleged was accustomed to flow through his land from the point at which it is alleged the water was being taken, it was not error upon the trial to grant a nonsuit after the conclusion of the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, there being no evidence to show to what extent the flow of water had been diminished, nor that it had been diminished to a substantial extent, nor that the complainant had been or would be damaged by the acts complained of.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 S.E. 802, 136 Ga. 483, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoner-v-patten-ga-1911.